|Notations 7 to 12 of 200+
Notice the Scaling Vertices are already over 8 Million at the 12th notation
|2.78593×10 -6kg||5.57186×10-6kg||1.11437×10 -5kg||M(kg)||2.22874×10 -5kg||4.45749×10-5kg||8.91498×10-5kg|
|Discussion: This fledgling model of the universe, to gain a little respect, will be required to incorporate the extensive work that has gone into the parametrization of ΛCDM (Lambda cold dark matter) or Lambda-CDM model. To begin that process, people have been challenged to find those formulas embedded within this model.
Speed of Light: These simple calculations are listed to challenge us to think of the processes and relations between numbers. This ratio, the notational multiples of the Planck Length to Planck Time, is very basic. Again, the experimental measurement is 299,792,458 meters/second in a vacuum. Within notation 7, the simple result of the numbers are given above. 299,791,784.89 m/s. Then variations are still difficult to discern. We will attempt to find the resolution of Planck Length and Planck Time carried out eight decimal places each and do recalculations.
Tweet and Retweet
“Let there be light! https://bbludata.wordpress.com/1-204/ Observe the 10th row. Planck Length/Planck Time ratio along 201+ notations!”
“Help interpret the math?!? https://bbludata.wordpress.com/1-204/ Background: In early May, some among us began asking the question, “Could the Big Bang theory implode?” Others made projects, “Perhaps we might start a movement to blow up the big bang. It’s inherent nihilism is making a mess of this little world.” May 2016
Key observation: These five Planck base units are intimately woven. There are hundreds of calculations to test between them.
Key Questions: Do these notations give the ontological studies a possible domain within which to work? Is there also a place within these notations for the mind? (This discussion/observations/questions inquiry was begun on May 6, 2016. It is “to be continued.”)
Key words: (primary concepts and links to references for these six notations) What about the placement of the Planck temperature? Do the calculations of Max Planck warrant that it be placed with the others at bottom of the chart?
Help wanted: For every notation, we would like to have an expert and a team. Within this group of notations, we seek help from those people expert in combinatorics, cellular automaton, cubic close packing, bifurcation theory (with Mitchell Feigenbaum’s constants), the Langlands program, mereotopology and point-free geometry (A.N. Whitehead, Harvard, 1929), the 80-known binary operations, and scalar field theory. Can you help us?